Having finished Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, I have some spoiler-filled thoughts. Highlight the inviso-text below.
Like everyone else, I was shocked by the climax of Half-Blood Prince. I've expected Dumbledore's death since the first book, but I never thought Snape would be the one to do him in. (Actually, I thought it a fair chance that Harry might kill him.)
What's more, I've always been soft--not to say completely enamored--with Severus Snape. How enamored? I wrote not so long ago that "My pet theory is that Snape, not Harry, is the true hero of the series." I'll put that up on the shelf with my prediction in the summer of 2000 that America was about to enter a era of Democratic political dominance. Oops.
So disaffected am I by Snape's treachery, that I hereby renounce the House of Slytherin.
That said, let me add that I still believe it possible that we will see Snape redeemed. Rowling has left enough ambiguity that we might wonder if Dumbledore was secretly imploring Snape to finish him in order to spare Draco, or why Snape made a point of preventing Harry from using an unforgivable curse outside the castle, or why, back in Prisoner of Azkaban, Snape thrust himself between the werewolf Lupin and Harry, Ron, and Hermione. Snape was a double-agent; he now appears to be a triple-agent. There seems to be the smallest possibility that he is, in fact, a quadruple agent.
All of this, I suspect, will turn on the identity of "RAB." I note that the only wizarding surname we've been exposed to so far is "Black." A careful review of the tapestry section of Order of the Phoenix might prove helpful here.
On the hierarchy of Harry Potter books, I'd put Half-Blood Prince just a half-step below Order of the Phoenix, which itself is just a half-step below Goblet of Fire. We could hardly have asked for anything more from Ms. Rowling. In a world filled with disappointments, Harry Potter has always exceeded my wildest hopes by a factor of three. I will be very sad to see the series end.
Which leads me to one final thought: When Rowling finishes the series there will naturally be a clamor for her to give us more Potter somehow--a spin-off featuring Hermione, or Fred and George, perhaps. My own hope is that she will instead settle down and write Hogwarts: A History.
38 minutes ago
4 comments:
"RAB"
Wasn't Sirus Black's brother Remelus Black or something like that? He apparently was a death eater who died young. Maybe it will turn out that he did not die, and instead has been fighting Voldemort himself by finding and destroying the horicruxes (sp?)
Snapes so rocks.
Rowling, Joss -- you sure do love the pop-culture that liberals put out weekly standard boy.
Good lord. Are you saying you don't know how it turns out? Snape made the Unbreakable whatever vow, which means that either Dumbledore died or Snape and Draco both die. You knew that at the beginning. Dumbledore knew that Snape had made that vow. Dumbledore wanted to die because otherwise Snape and Draco would.
Snape's working for Dumbledore. I thought that was obvious to everyone except 9 year olds. There was an extensive discussion over at Kevin Drum's blog, as well as my forum, The Perfect World (www.theperfectworld.us) but I'm surprised anyone would need it pointed out.
Something else you may want to know: Rowling has said that the third film has an unintentional spoiler in it--the director included a scene not in the book that clearly tips off the ending.
When Lupin is turning into a werewolf in the book, Snape is nowhere to be found, and was wholly triumphant that he'd done over his two old enemies. In the film, Snape runs out of the willow just as Lupin changes and howls. Instantly and reflexively, Snape protects the three kids.
That's the spoiler.
Signed, someone who thinks Rowling's just a few steps up from a hack and completely obvious and so has even less excuse to read the books.
Post a Comment