Palin bad! Obama good! Racists! Fascists!
(King.)
King bad. King kind of good. But only good because sophisticates know how bad he is. Rubes who think he's good: Also bad.
Teabaggers!
Seems to me that King has earned a more serious effort from the New York Times. (Though on third read, I'm not sure it's clear that the reviewer actually read the whole book.)
2 comments:
How is this plot any different than the plot for "The Mist"?
This GS post made me realize that it's been at least 3 years since I read anything in the NYT.
Post a Comment