Friday, September 02, 2005

"I Won't Contribute to Katrina"

He makes the other guy who's not going to give presents look like a saint:
. . . an employee approached me and said, "Would you like to give a dollar for Hurricane Katrina?"

I said, "No."

First off, I'm offended that the store employees are wandering around fundraising instead of helping customers, especially when it's so obvious that the store conglomerate uses these do-it-yourself machines to cut down on the number of employees necessary to help customers so that the store conglomerate can turn a larger profit while having fewer of those pesky union workers to deal with.

But beyond that, I'm sick of footing the bill for George W. Bush and the rest of his so-called compassionate conservatives. It's been well-documented over the past two days that there were all kinds of warnings about what could happen to New Orleans and that the levees designed to keep out the water were sinking or uncompleted.

What did Bush do? Nothing. Actually, worse than nothing. He was so busy fighting his cowboy war in Iraq (cheers to Hugo Chavez for the analogy) that he actually diverted money away from the projects that might have saved New Orleans because the war was so damn expensive! And now I should pony up to help out? Sorry, Charlie. . . .

You 60 million losers who voted for this loser open YOUR wallets. This president declared war on the poor long ago, and while some of us cared enough to vote for someone who gave a damn, you buried your heads in the sand, babbled about abortion and family values, and voted for the doofus.

And now you want to act all high and mighty and come asking me for a buck or two to help these poor people? Sorry, Charlie. Take an extra buck or two out of the fund you set aside to buy seventeen Support Our Troops magnets to stick all over your car to show how patriotic you are.

You want disaster relief? Impeach George W. Bush.

Patrick Ruffini has more.

Update: This post is, in its own way, even more disturbing:
I'm not going to post the piece I started to write.

My original reaction to the Katrina catastrophe was going to be: "NOT ONE DIME."

For an hour or so, I contemplated the idea of turning it into a crusade: No-one in the blue states (where the money is) should give one dime of aid to the victims of this hurricane, which devastated Bush-friendly regions.

Why did I flirt with such a callous attitude?

Because it should be obvious to all that this tragedy was not just an act of God. Dubya and his diety conspired to transform mere disaster into an unprecedented mega-catastrophe.

Scientists warn us to expect more Katrinas. Global warming -- the existence of which W would prefer to rationalize away -- caused the temperature of the sea's surface to rise in the Gulf of Mexico, thereby transforming what should have been a manageable hurricane into a monster.

The National Guard was off in Iraq stealing oil -- and everything else in that nation -- all to benefit Haliburton and the oil companies. They could have been in N.O. earlier, building levies, overseeing evacuation.

Bush financially eviscerated the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The money went to his Iraq debacle. . . .

So why was I thinking of starting a movement against giving aid to the stricken areas?

Because these are red states. They voted for Bush. These ninnies obviously wanted these policies, and they deserve to live with the consequences of their votes.

A large part of me still believes that many of these W-worshipping numbskulls deserve to suffer and to die. They brought it on themselves. Let them look to Jayzuss for aid: It's time they stopped leeching off the more productive blue staters. . . .

So, at least, I started to write. But then (to paraphrase the old song) I thought I'd better think it out again.

Many of the victims, the ones who have suffered the most, are poor. The hardest hit were the blue state folk living among the red state maniacs. New Orleans, we should note, went heavily for Kerry.

And that's why we must help. Although it was very tempting to say otherwise.

But let us make one thing clear: We WILL politicize this issue.


Anonymous said...

Gee, the left is so open minded that the only people they want to help are the ones that agree with them.

Anonymous said...

"But let us make one thing clear: We WILL politicize this issue."

Phew -- good thing he made that clear. I hadn't picked up on it yet.

Anonymous said...

These people are crazy. Mind you, there has always been crazy leftist willing to politicize everything and blame Ronald Reagan or Richard Nixon or George Bush for everything large and small. What has changed is the existence of the Internet. All these like-minded idiots now have an international forum. I am not advocating shutting them down, they can make up any crap their fevered minds can concoct.

Anonymous said...

Are these Johnathan Last's words are is he posting someone elses comments? Whoever it was they reveal the workings of a troubled man, and a smarmy one to boot.
Not contributing though is an option, but what makes better sense is not spending good money after bad. NO, is a dysfunctionaly city, it needs chemotherapy, not compassion.

Anonymous said...

What's all this talk about a poor response? I'm still waiting to see it. Does anyone have a similar disaster to compare it to? Not in recent U.S. history. 4 days to start getting large volume resources to a largely inaccessible site, USING people that had to evacuate the area themselves is probably pretty reasonable. The real question is why was there anyone left in New Orleans, or coastal Mississippi to begin with? The Tsunami victims were taken out because there was no warning. These areas knew FOR DAYS that a category 5 hurricane was coming and their levees are only rated at a 3. There shouldn't have been a soul remaining in those areas. That's where the failure lies.